SSAT SSAT
 
 
Abstracts Only
SSAT residents Corner
Find SSAT on Facebook SSAT YouTube Channel Follow SSAT on Twitter
SSAT
 

Back to 2011 Program


Gastrointestinal Resource Utilization After Gastric Bypass
Ross F. Goldberg*1, Michael Parker1, John Stauffer1, Mauricia Buchanan1, Jacob Sylvia1, Salman Moti1, Susanne Preissler1, James M. Swain2, Michael G. Sarr2, Horacio J. Asbun1, C. Daniel Smith1, Steven P. Bowers1
1Department of Surgery, Mayo Clinic - Florida, Jacksonville, FL; 2Department of Surgery, Mayo Clinic - Minnesota, Rochester, MN

Introduction:Bariatric surgery decreases weight and its associated comorbidities, but it is unclear whether health care resources are over-utilized in the post-gastric bypass state. There are few, long-term studies documenting the utilization of health care resources after gastric bypass in a mixed American population. Our aim was to review all interventions related to gastrointestinal complications after gastric bypass surgery. Methods and Procedures:We retrospectively reviewed the medical records of 261 subjects in Olmsted County (thus captured by the Rochester Epidemiology Project) who underwent a Roux-en-Y gastric bypass (RYGB) from Jan. 1997 through Dec. 2004. Patients were predominantly female (84%), with a mean age of 45 years +/- 10, and a mean preoperative BMI of 49 +/- 9; 72 patients (28%) underwent laparoscopic operation. Retrocolic technique was used in 188 patients (72%). All subsequent gastrointestinal surgical and endoscopic interventions and abdominal imaging studies were reviewed. Imaging studies were categorized as Abdominal CT (CTAP) and non-CT imaging (including ultrasonography and fluoroscopy). Resource utilization rates for 2006 for Americans aged 55-64 years, as published by the CDC, and published Medicare beneficiary utilization rates for 2001 were used as a reference. Results:Median patient follow-up was 7 years (range 6-13) after RYGB, for a total number of 2039 patient-years (pt-yrs). A total of 162 abdominal operations were performed in 95 patients (36%); 58 operations in 48 patients were repairs of abdominal wall hernias and 34 were re-operations for wound complications in 21 patients. Sixty-nine gastrointestinal operations, 46 in 32 patients (12%) were directly attributed to the post-RYGB state. There were 132 upper endoscopies performed in 78 patients (30%), a rate of 65 per 1000 pt-yrs, compared to 28 upper endoscopies per 1000 pt-yrs for Americans aged 55-64. Eighteen study patients had 32 therapeutic endoscopies for complications of RYGB. One-hundred and two patients underwent a total of 348 CTAP; a rate of 171 per 1000 pt-yrs, which were evenly distributed throughout patient-years of follow-up. For non-CT imaging, 119 patients underwent 432 studies, a rate of 212 per 1000 pt-yrs; half were in the first three years postop. Medicare national average for CT imaging was 391 per 1000 patients, and for non-CT imaging, 3556 per 1000 patients. Surgical technique was not associated with any pattern of re-intervention or complication, except for incisional hernias which were greater after open RYGB.Conclusions:Even though the benefits of RYGB are well established in the literature, patients after RYGB appear to have a greater requirement for gastrointestinal procedures than the average American population. This would not be unexpected in patients having undergone a major gastrointestinal operation.


Back to 2011 Program

 

 
Home | Contact SSAT