SSAT SSAT
 
 
Abstracts Only
SSAT residents Corner
Find SSAT on Facebook SSAT YouTube Channel Follow SSAT on Twitter
SSAT
 
SSAT 51st Annual Meeting Abstracts

Back to Program | 2010 Program and Abstracts Overview | 2010 Posters


Lack of Benefit to Perioperative Epidural Analgesia Among Patients Undergoing Elective Gastric and Pancreatic Resections
Jack E. Russo*, Richard J. Bold, Steve R. Martinez, Steven L. Chen, Jodi M. Coates, Robert J. Canter
Surgery/Surgical Oncology, University of California at Davis, Sacramento, CA

Background: Epidural pain catheters are purported to improve perioperative pain control and decrease rates of ileus, pneumonia, and venous thromboembolism. Since these data are primarily limited to gynecologic and thoracic surgical procedures, we hypothesized that use of epidural pain catheters would demonstrate benefit among patients undergoing gastric and pancreatic resections. Methods. From January 2007 to June 2009, 126 patients underwent elective gastric and pancreatic resections for space-occupying lesions at an academic university hospital. Emergency, traumatic, pediatric, and disseminated cancer cases were excluded. Clinicopathologic data were reviewed among epidural (E) and non-epidural (NE) patients for their association with perioperative outcomes. Data were analyzed using parametric and non-parametric methods as appropriate. Results. 91 patients (72%) received an epidural, and 35 (28%) did not. Pancreaticoduodenectomy was performed in 71 patients (56%), distal pancreatectomy in 25 patients (20%), and partial gastrectomy in 24 patients (19%). There were no significant differences in mean postoperative pain scores or ketorolac use among E and NE patients. 21% of E patients had their catheter removed within 48 hours because of poor pain control or hemodynamic issues. 14% of E patients also received concomitant intravenous narcotic infusion with a functioning E. The prevalence of overall complications (40% E versus 34% NE, P=0.68), prolonged ileus (13% E versus 11% NE, P=1.00), pneumonia (12% E versus 6% NE, P=0.51), venous thromboembolism (8% E versus 6% NE, P=1.00), and length of stay (median 8 days E versus 7 days NE, P=0.58) were not significantly different between the two groups. Subgroup analysis of patients without complications (N=78) demonstrated no significant differences in pain scores, return of bowel function, or length of stay between E and NE patients.Conclusions. The use of epidural pain catheters does not alter perioperative outcomes among patients undergoing elective gastric and pancreatic resections. Routine use of epidurals in this subgroup of patients may not be indicated.


Back to Program | 2010 Program and Abstracts Overview | 2010 Posters

 

 
Home | Contact SSAT