SSAT Home  |  Past Meetings
Society for Surgery of the Alimentary Tract

Back to 2019 Abstracts

Stijn van Roessel1, Marin Strijker*1, Ewout W. Steyerberg2, Jesse V. Groen2, J. S. Mieog2, Olivier R. Busch1, Asif Halimi3, Laura Zarantonello3, B. Groot Koerkamp4, Ulrich F. Wellner5, Casper H. van Eijck4, Mohammad Abu Hilal6, Marco Del Chiaro3, Tobias Keck5, Adnan A. Alseidi7, Claudio Bassi8, Marc Besselink1
1Amsterdam UMC, Amsterdam, Netherlands; 2Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, Netherlands; 3Karolinska University Hospital, Stockholm, Sweden; 4Erasmus MC, Rotterdam, Netherlands; 5Universitätsklinikum Schleswig-Holstein, Lubeck, Germany; 6University Hospital Southampton NHS Foundation Trust, Southampton, United Kingdom; 7Virginia Mason Medical Center, Seattle, WA; 8University and Hospital Trust of Verona, Verona, Italy

Background: A recent systematic review identified only two prediction models for survival in resectable pancreatic cancer of high methodological quality. One of these two, the Amsterdam prediction model (including differentiation grade, positive lymph node ratio, margin status and adjuvant therapy) had not been validated. The objective of this study was to validate the Amsterdam prediction model in a large international cohort.

Methods: All consecutive patients who underwent pancreatoduodenectomy for pancreatic cancer between 2000-2015 at 9 tertiary hospitals from 6 countries were included for analysis. Calibration and model performance for prediction of 3-year and 5-year survival were evaluated and compared to the 8th edition of the TNM staging system, using Uno's C-statistic, the Receiver Operating Characteristics (ROC) curves and area under the curves (AUC). Validation was performed according to the TRIPOD statement.

Results: A total of 1,943 patients were included (mean age 65 years, 52% male), with a median overall survival of 23.6 months. The validation cohort was demographically comparable to the design cohort, but had a higher lymph node yield (median of 19 vs. 8) and more N2 disease (22.0% vs. 40.3%), and a higher use of adjuvant therapy (74.0% vs. 26.0%). Calibration analysis demonstrated that the predictions of 3-year survival did not systematically deviate from the observed survival rates with a slope of 0.85 and an intercept of 0.04. Uno's C-statistic was 0.65 in the validation cohort, compared to 0.67 in the derivation cohort. ROC-curves showed an AUC of 0.70 and 0.72 for 3- and 5-year survival, compared to 0.65 and 0.68 for the TNM 8, respectively. Analysis of model performance among the different countries demonstrated a robust C-statistic, ranging from 0.63 to 0.67. The web-based calculator was updated with these data.

Conclusions: This international multicenter study validated the previous predictions of the Amsterdam model for 3- and 5-year survival after pancreatoduodenectomy for pancreatic cancer. Model performance was fairly accurate in terms of calibration and discrimination, and the model demonstrated robustness within the different countries. The model incorporates easily available variables (differentiation grade, lymph node ratio, margin status and adjuvant therapy) and the web-based calculator facilitate easy use in daily practice.

Back to 2019 Abstracts
Gaslamp Quarter
Sunset and Palm Trees