SSAT Home SSAT Annual Meeting

Annual Meeting Home
Past & Future Meetings
 

Back to Annual Meeting Posters


Laparoscopic vs. Open Bilateral Inguinal Hernia Repair: a NSQIP Analysis
Muhammad Asad Khan*, Roman Grinberg, John Afthinos, Karen E. Gibbs
Staten Island University Hospital, Staten Island, NY

Objectives: Laparoscopic inguinal herniorrhaphy was introduced into surgical practice in 1990. It has shown a great deal of promise and was shown to allow quicker and more thorough assessment and repair of bilateral groin hernias. However the evolution of tension-free open repair with mesh allows use of local or regional anesthesia and is associated with rapid recovery and a low recurrence rate. We sought to compare a large number of patients and compare national trends and outcomes between these approaches.
Methods: The NSQIP database was queried for laparoscopic or open bilateral inguinal hernia repair. Age, gender and comorbidities were quantified and outcomes data collected. Specifically, morbidity, mortality, length of stay and operative times were examined. Statistical analysis was then performed. A p-value of < 0.05 was considered significant.
Results: A total of 4985 patients were identified, of which 2025 patients underwent open repair of bilateral inguinal hernia and 2960 patients underwent laparoscopic repair.
Conclusions: Nationally, 59.4% of bilateral hernias were repaired laparoscopically. More patients with diabetes, HTN and history of CABG underwent open repair. Laparoscopic and open approaches have a similar complication profile. Operative time was shorter in the laparoscopic group (75.9 ± 35 vs. 85.2 ± 38.3 min, p<0.001) as was length of stay (0.18 ±1.1 vs. 0.409 ± 3.0 days, p<0.001).
Table 1. Patient comorbidites
Open Repair N=2025 Laparoscopic Repair N=2960 P-Value
Male gender 1877 (92.7%) 2825 (95.4%) <.001
Diabetes on oral 96 (4.7%) 101 (3.4%) 0.013
Diabetes on Insulin 23 (1.1%)20 (0.7%) 0.013
HTN 742 (36.6) 834 (28.2%) <0.001
CHF in 30 days2 (0.1%) 2 (0.1%)1
History of MI in 6 months1 (0%) 2 (0.1%)1
Prior PCI117 (5.8%)109 (3.7%).001
Prior CABG 123 (6.1%)105 (3.5%) <.001
PAD 13 (0.6%) 12 (0.4%)0.308
ESRD 10 (0.5%) 9 (0.3%) 0.350
Smoker 409 (20.2%)566 (19.1%)0.363
Bleeding disorder46 (2.3%) 34 (1.1%) .003
ASA III or above 25 (1.2%) 14 (0.5%) .005



Table 2. Patient outcome and complications
Open Repair N=2025 Laparoscopic Repair N=2960 P-Value
Superficial SSI 8 (0.4%) 8 (0.4%) 1
Deep incisional SSI 1(0%) 00.406
Pneumonia4 (0.2%) 3 (0.1%) 0.452
Unplanned Intubation 1 (0%) 2 (0.1%) 1
PE 1 (0%) 2 (0.1%) 1
Return to OR 19 (0.9%) 24 (0.8%) 0.643
ARF 0 (0%) 2 (0.1%)0.517
UTI 6 (0.3%) 9 (0.3%) 1
MI 0 11
DVT 3 (0.1%) 3 (0.1%) 0.135
Operative time (min) 85.2 ± 38.3 75.9 ± 35 <0.001
Length of stay (days) 0.409 ± 3.0 0.18 ±1.1 <0.001
Mortality 2 (0.1%) 0 (0%) 0.165


Back to Annual Meeting Posters

 



© 2024 Society for Surgery of the Alimentary Tract. All Rights Reserved. Read the Privacy Policy.