Back to Annual Meeting Posters
Laparoscopic vs. Open Unilateral Inguinal Hernia Repairs: a NSQIP Analysis
Muhammad Asad Khan*, Roman Grinberg, John Afthinos, Karen E. Gibbs Staten Island University Hospital, Staten Island, NY
Objectives: Open inguinal hernia repair has been the mainstay in both elective and emergent hernias for most of surgical history. The advancement of laparoscopic hernia repair has challenged this notion; however few trials have compared the laparoscopic approach to open. We sought to query the NSQIP database to amass a large number of patients to better characterize patent comorbidities and outcomes of both approaches. Methods: The NSQIP database was queried for laparoscopic or open inguinal hernia repair for unilateral hernias from 2007 to 2009. Age, gender and comorbidities were quantified and outcomes data collected. Specifically, morbidity, mortality, length of stay and operative times were examined. Statistical analysis was then performed. A p-value of < 0.05 was considered significant. Results: A total of 29,755 patients were identified, out of which 25,192 underwent open hernia repair, while 4,563 underwent laparoscopic repair. Conclusions: Our study revealed that only 15% of unilateral hernias were repaired laparoscopically. The more diverse anesthetic choices available for open repair allowed patients with significant comorbidities to undergo hernia repair. Despite this there was an increased overall rate of morbidity (0.5% vs. 0.2%, p = 0.012). Other outcomes measures were not different except for length of stay, which was longer for the open group. Conclusions: Our study revealed that only 15% of unilateral hernias were repaired laparoscopically. The more diverse anesthetic choices available for open repair allowed patients with significant comorbidities to undergo hernia repair. Despite this there was an increased overall rate of morbidity (0.5% vs. 0.2%, p = 0.012). Other outcomes measures were not different except for length of stay, which was longer for the open group. Table 1. Patient Comorbdities | Open Repair N=25192 | Laproscopic Repair N=4563 | P-Value | Age | 55.9 ± 17.3 | 52.3 ± 16.1 | <.001 | Male gender | 22668 (90%) | 4155 (91.1%) | 0.026 | Diabetes on oral | 1190 (4.7%) | 143 (3.1%) | <.001 | Diabetes on Insulin | 383 (1.5%) | 36 (0.8%) | <.001 | HTN | 8987 (35.7%) | 1314 (28.8%) | <.001 | COPD | 727 (2.9%) | 59 (1.3%) | <.001 | CHF in 30 days | 41 (0.2%) | 4(0.1%) | 0.301 | History of MI in 6months | 35 (0.1%) | 1 (0.0%) | 0.035 | Prior PCI | 1334 (5.3%) | 167 (3.7%) | <.001 | Prior CABG | 1414 (5.6%) | 168 (3.7%) | <.001 | PAD | 189 (0.8%) | 189 (0.8%) | .005 | ESRD | 133 (0.5%) | 13 (0.3%) | 0.033 | BMI | 26.3 ± 4.3 | 26.5 ± 4.3 | 0.006 | Anesthesia type General Local MAC Spinal | 16776 (66.6%) 534 (2.1%) 6414 (25.5%) 979 (3.9%) | 4473 (98.0%) 5 (0.1%) 73 (1.6%) 8 (0.2%) | <0.001 | ASA III or above | 378 (1.5%) | 23 (0.1%) | <.001 | Bleeding disorder | 567 (2.3%) | 63 (1.4%) | <.001 | Partially Dependent | 200 (0.8%) | 16 (0.4%) | 0.001 | Steroid use | 345 (1.4%) | 36 (0.8%) | .001 | Smoker | 5054 (20.1%) | 772 (16.9%) | <.001 | | | | |
Table 2. Postoperative outcome and complications. | Open Repair N=25192 | Laparoscopic Repair N=4563 | P-Value | Superficial SSI | 87 (0.3%) | 13 (0.3%) | 0.572 | Deep incisional SSI | 18 (0.1%) | 2 (0.0%) | 0.757 | Organ space SSI | 11 (0.0%) | 0 | 0.392 | Wound disruption | 10 (0.0%) | 1 (0.0%) | 1 | Pneumonia | 27 (0.1%) | 1 (0.0%) | 0.112 | Unplanned Intubation | 16 (0.1%) | 1 (0.0%) | 0.498 | PE | 14 (0.1%) | 2 (0%) | 1 | Failure to extubate | 7 (0.0%) | 1 (0%) | 1 | Return to OR | 177 (0.7%) | 24 (0.5%) | 0.204 | ARF | 5 (0%) | 0 | 1 | Cardiac arrest | 59 (0.2%) | 0 | 0.600 | MI | 14 (0.1%) | 2 (0%) | 1.0 | DVT | 19 (0.1%) | 1 (0.0%) | 0.246 | Sepsis | 26 (0.1%) | 2 (0%) | 0.3 | Neuro complication | 16 (0.1%) | 2 (0%) | 1 | Overall morbidity | 141 (0.5%) | 12 (0%) | .012 | Operative time (mins | 58.6 ± 26.9 | 59.2 ± 31.3 | 0.183 | Hospital stay (days) | 0.27 ± 3.9 | 0.16 ± 1.2 | <0.001 | Mortality | 18 (0.1%) | 1 (0%) | 0.342 | | | | |
Back to Annual Meeting Posters
|