Members Members Residents Job Board
Join Today Renew Your Membership Make A Donation
2006 Abstracts: Primary versus secondary esophageal motility disorders. Diagnosis and implications for treatment
Back to 2006 Program and Abstracts
Primary versus secondary esophageal motility disorders. Diagnosis and implications for treatment
Fernando A. Herbella, Ian Nipomnick, Pietro Tedesco, Marco G. Patti; Department of Surgery, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, CA

Background. In untreated patients with a manometric pattern of either diffuse esophageal spasm (DES) or nutcracker esophagus (NE), the findings of a pH monitoring study are essential as the disease is considered a primary motility disorder (PEMD) only in the absence of reflux (GERD). If reflux is present, the motility abnormality is considered secondary and treatment is directed towards reflux. Aims. To determine in patient with a manometric picture of DES and NE: (a) if symptoms alone distinguish PEMD from GERD; and (b) the value of ambulatory pH monitoring. Patients and Methods. Ambulatory pH monitoring identified GERD in: (1) 124/180 patients (69%) with a manometric picture of NE: 31/56 patients (55%) with a primary disorder were thought to have GERD, and were taking proton pump inhibitors; (2) 73/121 patients (60%) patients with a manometric picture of DES: 39/48 patients (81%) with a primary disorder were thought to have GERD, and were taking proton pump inhibitors. Results: see table for results. Conclusions. These data show that: (a) 2/3 of patients with a manometric picture of NE or DES have GERD; and (b) symptoms did not allow to distinguish PEMD from GERD; and (c) 68% of patients with PEMD had been treated for GERD. Esophageal manometry and pH monitoring are essential to distinguish PEMD from GERD and to guide appropriate therapy.

 

NE

DES

PEMD (n=56)

GERD (n=124)

PEMD (n=48)

GERD (n=73)

Age (years)

52±14

56±12

51±12

50±14

Dysphagia (% patients)

21

11

34 *

8 *

Dysphagia score (1-4)

3.4

3.3

3.6

3.5

Chest pain (% patients)

9

11

12

6

Chest pain score (1-4)

3.8 *

3.2 *

3.0

3.4

Heartburn (% patients)

23 *

39 *

21

26

Heartburn score (1-4)

3.5 *

3.6 *

3.0

3.8


* statistical significant (p<0.05)


Back to 2006 Program and Abstracts


Society for Surgery of the Alimentary Tract

Facebook Twitter YouTube

Email SSAT Email SSAT
500 Cummings Center, Suite 4400, Beverly, MA 01915 500 Cummings Center
Suite 4400
Beverly, MA 01915
+1 978-927-8330 +1 978-927-8330
+1 978-524-0498 +1 978-524-0498
Links
About
Membership
Publications
Newsletters
Annual Meeting
Join SSAT
Job Board
Make a Pledge
Event Calendar
Awards