Society for Surgery of the Alimentary Tract

SSAT Home SSAT Home Past & Future Meetings Past & Future Meetings
Facebook X Linkedin YouTube

Back to 2025 Abstracts


DEVELOPMENT AND VALIDATION OF THE ALBI-GAMMA-GLUTAMYL TRANSFERASE SCORE FOR ENHANCED PROGNOSTIC ACCURACY AFTER HEPATOCELLULAR CARCINOMA RESECTION
Miho Akabane1, Jun Kawashima1, Abdullah Atlaf1, Zayed Rashid1, Shahzaib Zindani1, Mujtaba Khalil1, Azza Sarfraz1, François Cauchy2, Federico Aucejo3, Irinel Popescu4, Minoru Kitago5, Guillaume Martel6, Francesca Ratti7, Luca Aldrighetti7, George A. Poultsides8, Yuki Imaoka8, Andrea Ruzzenente9, Itaru Endo10, Ana Gleisner11, Hugo P. Marques12, Vincent Lam13, Tom Hugh14, Feng Shen15, Timothy M. Pawlik*1
1Surgery, The Ohio State Wexner Medical Center, Columbus, OH; 2Hopital Beaujon, Clichy, Île-de-France, France; 3Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, OH; 4Institutul Clinic Fundeni Sectia clinica medicina interna, Bucuresti, Romania; 5Keio Gijuku Daigaku, Minato-ku, Tokyo, Japan; 6University of Ottawa, Ottawa, ON, Canada; 7Ospedale San Raffaele Sede di San Raffaele Turro, Milano, Lombardia, Italy; 8Stanford University, Stanford, CA; 9Universita degli Studi di Verona, Verona, Veneto, Italy; 10Yokohama Shiritsu Daigaku, Yokohama, Kanagawa, Japan; 11University of Colorado System, Denver, CO; 12Hospital Curry Cabral, Lisboa, Lisboa, Portugal; 13Westmead Hospital, Westmead, New South Wales, Australia; 14University of Sydney, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia; 15Shanghai Eastern Hepatobiliary Surgery Hospital, Shanghai, China

Introduction: Despite being widely used among patients with hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC), the albumin-bilirubin (ALBI) score does not directly indicate liver cell damage or biliary obstruction, which are critical aspects of liver pathology. In contrast, gamma-glutamyl transferase (GGT) reflects hepatic oxidative stress and inflammation—key drivers of cancer progression. We sought to evaluate the combination of ALBI-GGT as a prognostic tool to predict long-term outcomes among patients undergoing resection of HCC.
Methods: Patients who underwent curative-intent hepatectomy for HCC between 2000 and 2023 were identified from an international, multi-institutional database. The cohort was divided into training (65%) and testing (35%) cohorts and multivariable Cox proportional hazards regression analysis was utilized to examine the association of ALBI-GGT on overall survival (OS).
Results: Among 759 patients, median ALBI score was -3.60 [-3.87, -3.26] and median GGT level was 55.0 [31.0–93.0] U/L. On multivariable analysis, Tumor Burden Score (HR 1.051 [1.015–1.090]; p = 0.006) and ASA class >2 (HR 1.473 [1.005–2.161]; p = 0.047), as well as ALBI score (HR 1.473 [1.112–1.950]; p=0.007) and GGT (HR 1.007 [1.004–1.010]; p<0.001) were independent predictors of OS. There was near linear correlation between increasing ALBI scores and GGT values and higher hazards of death (Figure). A combined ALBI-GGT score demonstrated superior predictive performance in the testing set (AUC 0.68 [0.58–0.72], AIC 1,379) versus ALBI score (AUC 0.62 [0.56–0.69], AIC 1,387) or GGT (AUC 0.65 [0.58–0.72], AIC, 1,378) alone. Time-dependent AUC analysis over the first 5-years following resection consistently demonstrated a better performance by combining ALBI-GGT to predict survival (AUC, 1-year: ALBI-GGT, AUC 0.782; ALBI alone, AUC 0.747; GGT alone, AUC 0.700; 3-year: ALBI-GGT, AUC 0.725; ALBI alone, AUC 0.628; GGT alone, AUC 0.713; 5-year: ALBI-GGT, AUC 0.688; ALBI alone, AUC 0.647; GGT alone, AUC 0.656). ALBI-GGT was able to stratify patients into distinct prognostic groups (5-year OS: low ALBI-GGT, 85.0% vs. intermediate ALBI-GGT, 65.8% vs. high ALBI-GGT, 56.8%; p< .001).
Conclusion: ALBI score alone may not be sufficient to prognostically stratify HCC patients. Rather, the combination of ALBI with GGT was a better tool to stratify patients relative to long-term survival following resection of HCC.


Back to 2025 Abstracts