Outcome of reoperative antireflux surgery is dependent on the number of
previous repairs, the presenting symptoms and on the assessment of functional
and anatomic reasons for failure. The aim of this study was 1) to verify the
value of anatomic and functional assessment 2) to establish guidelines for
procedure selection and 3) to assess the outcome of remedial surgery.
One hundred fourteen patients with failed previous antireflux procedures
(median 1, range 1-4) who underwent remedial surgery were reviewed. Functional
assessment included barium esophagogram, stationary motility and 24 hour
esophageal pH monitoring. Patients with more than 20% simultaneous contractions
and/or contraction amplitudes < 25mmHg in the distal esophagus were
considered to have ineffective esophageal motility. Anatomic assessment was
based on upper endoscopy and intraoperative findings. The reoperative procedure
performed was a Nissen fundoplication in 53 patients (normal esophageal length
and motility), a Belsey Mark IV procedure in 24 (ineffective esophageal
motility) and a Collis gastroplasty and Belsey fundoplication in 19 (short
esophagus and ineffective motility). In 18 patients the esophagus was considered
to be unsalvageable and was replaced. Outcome was evaluated in 109 patients
(96%) at a median of 44 months (range 4-209) via a detailed questionnaire. The
primary symptom driving reoperation was dysphagia in 44, heartburn in 38 and a
combination of both symptoms in 28 patients. Four patients presented with chest
pain alone. Functional assessment and outcome according to the presenting
symptoms are shown in the table.
LES resting LES Prevalence of Esophageal Excellent/
pressure relaxation ineffective pH<4 good
(mmHg) (%) motility (% time) outcome
Heartburn 6.99±1.02* 88.4±3.1* 18% 12.63±1.36* 92%
Hb + Dys 10.12±1.47* 85.9±3.7* 54%** 16.81±3.25* 78%
Dysphagia 15.04±1.53 54.3±6.0 52%** 1.56±0.42 64%**
*ANOVA; Duncan (significant vs Dys) Mean ± SEM **Fisher's exact test (p<0.01 vs Hb)
Anatomic assessment showed that the repair was misplaced in 44 patients,
partially or completely disrupted in 27, herniated into the chest in 18 and too
long or too tight in 11. In 14 patients no abnormality was identified. There was
no postoperative or hospital mortality. Patients with normal esophageal body
motility had a significantly better outcome compared to those with ineffective
motility (p<0.05).
Careful assessment prior to remedial antireflux surgery identifies anatomic
and functional reasons for failure. The outcome is dependent on the predominant
symptom and is least satisfactory in patients with dysphagia. Procedure
selection based on functional and anatomic abnormalities optimizes the chance of
success.