1997 Abstract: 45 Is there a place for central pancreatectomy in pancreatic surgery?
Abstracts 1997 Digestive Disease Week
Is there a place for central pancreatectomy in pancreatic
surgery?
C Iacono, L Bortolasi, G Serio. Department of Surgery, Division of General
Surgery C, University of Verona, Italy.
Tumors located in the neck of the pancreas or in its contiguous portions,
not so small and superficial to be enucleated, are usually resected with a
Whipple procedure or left spleno-pancreatectomy even if benign. Such wide
resections have a low operative mortality rate, when performed by experienced
surgeons. Nevertheless, such surgery might cause digestive disorders, glucose
intollerance, and late post-splenectomy infection. Central pancreatectomy (CP)
is a segmentary resection: the cephalic stump is sutured and the distal stump is
anastomosed with a Roux-en-Y jejunal loop. The purpose of this study was to
evaluate whether CP has a place in pancreatic surgery. Methods Thirteen patients
underwent CP. Eleven patients were female, two were male. The mean age was 51
years (range 27-70). The diagnoses were: 5 endocrine tumors (3 insulinomas, 2
non-functioning tumors), 6 serous cystadenomas, 1 mucinous cystadenoma, 1 solid
cystic-papillary tumor. Results Mean operative time was 250 minutes (range
210-300); 5 patients (38.4%) needed hemotransfusion (2-3 Units). Mean size of
the lesions was 28.6 mm (range 12-50). Postoperative mortality was zero;
postoperative course was complicated in 3 patients (23%) (2 low output
pancreatic fistulas, lpurulent drainage, lpneumonia with pleural effusion). Mean
recovery time was 19 days (range 10-38). At a mean follow up of 68 mos. (range
5-162) patients did not show recurrence of tumors. US Doppler scan showed
complete patency of the spleno-mesenteric axis in all cases; no endocrine
syndrome was found postoperatively in the 3 patients with insulinoma. Endocrine
function was tested in 12 patients with oral glucose tolerance test from 6
months to 7 years after surgery and it was within normal limit in 11 patients;
the only patient with preoperative glucose intolerance did not worsen after
surgery. Exocrine function evaluated with PancreoLauryl test and fecal fat
excretion was normal in all the patients. Conclusion We think that CP has a
place in pancreatic surgery; it is a reliable technique for benign or borderline
malignant tumors of the pancreatic neck and its contiguous portions. It
represents a valid option to major pancreatic resections. In fact, it assures
the cure of the tumor with a surgical risk similar to that of standard
procedures. The advantages are represented by the preservation of more
pancreatic parenchyma, of the anatomy of the upper GI tract, of the biliary tree
and the spleen.