Abstracts 1997 Digestive Disease Week
Results of resection for hilar cholangiocarcinoma: American
versus Asian experience.
JI Tsao*, Y Nimura+, JW Braasch*, J Dugan§, N Hayakawa+, J Kamiya+, S
Kondo+, M Nagino+, M Kanai+. Departments of *General Surgery and §Pathology,
Lahey Hitchcock Clinic, Burlington, MA, and the +First Department of Surgery,
Nagoya University School of Medicine, Nagoya, Japan.
-
-
Cholangiocarcinoma involving the hepatic hilum is notorious for locoregional
extension and surgical inaccesibility. Most Western series have reported low
resectability and low overall survival rates. Recently, better results have been
reported by our Asian colleagues. This study compares the experiences with
management of hilar cholangiocarcinoma at two institutions, one American and one
Japanese. Data was obtained by retrospective review at the Lahey Clinic, and by
retrospective analysis of a prospectively gathered database at the University of
Nagoya.
Lahey Nagoya
Period of study 1980-95 1977-95
Patients seen, (n) 106 154
Patients resected, (n) 25 122
negative margin 8 100
positive margin 17 22
Bile duct resection alone, (n) 21 13
Combined liver resection, (n) 4 109
Operative mortality, % 4 8
Operative morbidity, % 44 51
5-yr survival, %
negative margin 25 24
positive margin 19 0
*Overall 5-yr survival, % 6 17
*survival among all patients seen with hilar cholangiocarcinoma
Summary: Survival rates are the same for patients resected with negative
margins whether in the US or Japan. However, a significantly higher
resectability rate contributed to a higher overall survival rate among Japanese
cohorts. Conclusion: More liberal use of combined liver and bile duct resection
significantly increases the rate of margin-negative resections and is currently
the only way to surgically improve the overall survival rate of patients with
hilar cholangiocarcinoma.
|