SSAT Annual Meeting SSAT Annual Meeting

 
Back to SSAT Site
Annual Meeting Home
SSAT Program and Abstracts
Ticketed and Highlighted Sessions
Other Meetings of Interest
Past & Future Meetings
Photo Gallery
 

Back to 2017 Program and Abstracts


IS PH TESTING NECESSARY BEFORE ANTIREFLUX SURGERY IN PATIENTS WITH ESOPHAGITIS?
Katrin Schwameis1, Steven Siegal*2, Brenda Lin3, Jordan Roman3, Ketetha Olengue3, Steven R. DeMeester2
1Surgery, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Vienna, Austria; 2Surgery, Oregon Clinic, Portland, OR; 3Surgery, Keck, USC, Los Angeles, CA

Introduction: The relationship between the Los Angeles (LA) grade of esophagitis on endoscopy and the presence and severity of esophageal acid exposure by pH-monitoring is not well defined. The aim of this study was to correlate esophageal acid exposure by pH-testing in patients with various grades of endoscopic esophagitis using the LA grading system to determine at what grade of esophagitis a pH-test is not necessary to confirm the presence of abnormal esophageal acid exposure.
Methods: A retrospective review was performed of the records of all patients who underwent upper endoscopy and were found to have esophagitis and who also had pH-monitoring (24- or 48-hour) from 2014 to 2016. The upper endoscopy and pH-test were performed with patients off of all acid suppression medications. An abnormal pH-test was determined based on the DeMeester score, and for 48-hour Bravo pH-testing an abnormal score on either one or both days was considered an abnormal test.
Results: There were 66 patients with a median age of 57 years. Esophagitis was LA grade A in 23, B in 26, C in 15 and D in 2 patients. An abnormal pH-score was present in 56 patients (85%). All patients with LA C or D esophagitis had an abnormal pH-score and so these two groups were combined for further analysis. In contrast, an abnormal pH-score was present in 83% and 77% of patients with LA A and B esophagitis, respectively (p=0.111). Details of acid exposure on pH-testing are shown (Table). Patients with LA C and D esophagitis had significantly more esophageal acid exposure based on % time pH < 4 than did patients with LA A or B esophagitis. Further, among patients that had Bravo 48-hour pH-testing an abnormal score on both days was significantly more common in patients with LA C or D esophagitis.
Conclusions: The presence of LA C or D esophagitis was always associated with increased esophageal acid exposure on pH-testing and is adequate proof of reflux disease in patients being considered for antireflux surgery. In contrast, pH-testing off medications is recommended prior to antireflux surgery in patients with LA A or B esophagitis since approximately 20% of these patients had a normal score and non-reflux etiologies may be associated with these minor degrees of esophagitis in some patients.
Table 1: Acid exposure related to LA grade of esophagitis (LA C and D combined). (Numbers are medians)

Acid exposure related to LA grade of esophagitis (LA C and D combined)
Total n=66LA A n=23LA B n=26LA C/D n=17p-value
Median DeMeester score18 (IQR, 15-33)34 (IQR, 13-49)33 (IQR, 27-45)0.284
Number with abnormal score (%)19 (83)20 (77)17 (100)0.111
Bravo pH-test (%)n=20 (87)n=23 (88%)n=15 (88)0.986
Abnormal pH-test 1 day only6 (30)5 (22)1 (7)0.238
Abnormal pH-test both days (%)10 (50)13 (57)14 (93)0.037
# of reflux episodes Day 165 (IQR, 46-92)76 (IQR, 29-117)117 (IQR, 73-149)0.132
# of reflux episodes Day 241 (IQR, 16-60)58 (IQR, 17-98)111 (IQR, 76-139)0.003
Fraction time pH <4 (%) Day 16.8 (IQR, 4-11)10.4 (IQR, 3-14)10.7 (IQR, 9-17)0.098
Fraction time pH < 4 (%) Day 26.8 (IQR, 3-10)8.7 (IQR, 2-16)12 (IQR, 8-17)0.208


Back to 2017 Program and Abstracts



© 2024 Society for Surgery of the Alimentary Tract. All Rights Reserved. Read the Privacy Policy.