Members Members Residents Job Board
Join Today Renew Your Membership Make A Donation
2009 Program and Abstracts: Does the Value of Pet-Ct Extend Beyond Pretreatment Staging? An Analysis of Survival in Patients with Esophageal Cancer
Back to Program | 2009 Program and Abstracts Overview | 2009 Posters
Does the Value of Pet-Ct Extend Beyond Pretreatment Staging? An Analysis of Survival in Patients with Esophageal Cancer
Boris Sepesi*, Marek Polomsky, Thomas J. Watson, Carolyn E. Jones, Virginia R. Litle, Daniel Raymond, Jeffrey H. Peters
University of Rochester Medical Center, Rochester, NY

Background: Most studies of pre-treatment positron emission tomographic (PET-CT) scanning have focused upon its use in tumor staging. The role of PET-CT in predicting survival has received comparably less attention. As such we sought to assess the relationship of pretreatment SUVmax to overall survival in surgical patients with esophageal cancer. Methods: The study population consisted of 57 patients who underwent esophagectomy for adenocarcinoma (n=47) or squamous cell carcinoma (n=10) of the esophagus. Patients were taken from a cohort of 116 consecutive esophagectomy patients between 7/2005 and 9/2008. PET-CT scanning was performed at a single center and SUVmax was recorded for each patient prior to any therapy. Ten of the 57 patients received neo-adjuvant chemotherapy (n=7) or chemoradiation (n=3). Median follow-up was 14.5 months. Survival was assessed using Kaplan-Meier analysis. Results: The median SUVmax on pretreatment PET-CT was 6.4 (range 0-59). Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve identified a SUVmax of 4.6 to optimally discriminate survival. Patients with low SUVmax (<4.6; N=21) had significantly (p<0.001) better survival (median survival not reached) than those with high SUVmax (>4.6; N=36; 19.27 months). Interestingly, Stage 3 patients with low SUVmax (n=8) had significantly better survival (p<0.05) than Stage 3 patients with high SUVmax (N=17). Likewise, N1 disease patients with low SUVmax (N=11) had significantly better survival (p<0.05) than high SUVmax N1 patients (N=26). There was a significant association between SUVmax and death on univariate logistic regression (p=0.022, HR 1.03, CI 1.00-1.06); age, gender, endoscopic tumor length, and pN, were not significant. When controlling for stage and grade on multivariate analysis, SUVmax remained independent of grade (p<0.05), but not stage (p=0.093). Conclusions: Pretreatment PET-CT SUVmax is strongly associated with survival in patients with esophageal carcinoma. Longer overall survival of Stage 3 or N1 patients with low pretreatment SUVmax may suggest more favorable tumor biology in this cohort of patients. This may be valuable prognostic information for patients with advanced disease.


Back to Program | 2009 Program and Abstracts | 2009 Posters


Society for Surgery of the Alimentary Tract

Facebook Twitter YouTube

Email SSAT Email SSAT
500 Cummings Center, Suite 4400, Beverly, MA 01915 500 Cummings Center
Suite 4400
Beverly, MA 01915
+1 978-927-8330 +1 978-927-8330
+1 978-524-0498 +1 978-524-0498
Links
About
Membership
Publications
Newsletters
Annual Meeting
Join SSAT
Job Board
Make a Pledge
Event Calendar
Awards