Members Login Job Board
Join Today Renew Your Membership Make A Donation
2009 Program and Abstracts: Bridge to Surgery Using Partially Covered Self Expandable Metal Stents (Pcms) in Malignant Biliary Stricture: An Acceptable Paradigm?
Back to Program | 2009 Program and Abstracts Overview | 2009 Posters
Bridge to Surgery Using Partially Covered Self Expandable Metal Stents (Pcms) in Malignant Biliary Stricture: An Acceptable Paradigm?
George H. Pop, James a. Richter, Bryan Sauer, Michele E. Rehan, Henry C. Ho, Melissa S. Phillips, Kristi Ellen, Todd W. Bauer, Reid B. Adams, Vanessa M. Shami, Michel Kahaleh*
Digestive Health, University of Virginia, Charlottesville, VA

Background and Aim: PCMS (Wallstent, Boston Scientific) have been extensively used for palliation of malignant distal biliary strictures. Many centers have been using them as a bridge to surgery (BTS) regardless of resectability with or without eventual neoadjuvant therapy. We analyzed the outcome of all patients receiving PCMS who were subsequently referred for surgery.Methods: Our prospectively established pancreatico-biliary database was retrospectively analyzed, to retrieve all patients undergoing PCMS placement for malignant biliary stricture and then undergoing surgery. Cancer type and staging, adverse events related to stent placement or surgery, type of surgery performed, time between stenting and surgery, length of hospitalization post op and follow-up post surgery were recordedResults: 27 patients (21 men, median age of 66 years, range 39-82) received PCMS (Table 1). Indications for placement included biliary stricture related to pancreatic cancer (n=23) or other cancers (n=4). Median time between stenting and surgery was 32 days (range: 6-569). Median hospitalization following surgery was 7 days (0-40). All patients underwent exploratory laparoscopy, followed in 8 (30%) by a Whipple procedure with uneventful removal of the PCMS. 19 patients (70%) were found to be unresectable on laparoscopy or laparotomy with 8 (30%) patients undergoing peritoneal or liver metastasis biopsy. PCMS were left in place in those 19 patients. Complication related to PCMS included migration (n=5, 19%), tissue overgrowth (n=2, 7%), and impaction (n=1, 4%), all of them managed by endoscopic removal and replacement with PCMS, with only one of them subsequently undergoing a Whipple, the others being unresectable. Median follow-up post surgery was 210 days (range: 9-1642). Conclusion:PCMS are an appropriate BTS option. For resectable patients, PCMS results in biliary drainage and allows for neoadjuvant treatment without precluding subsequent curative resection (Whipple). For unresectable patients, long term biliary drainage is provided by PCMS.
Table 1

N 27
Pancreatic adenocarcinomaLymphomaDuodenal AdenocarcinomaMetastatic Breast Cancer 23 (85%)2 (7%)1 (4%)1 (4%)
Stage IStage IIStage IIIStage IV 3 (11%)8 (29%)12(45%)4 (15%)
Preop Chemoradiation 2 (7%)
Time from Stent to Surgery (days) 32 (6-569)
LaparoscopyWhippleBiopsy 27 (100%)8 (30%)8 (30%)
Total Curative Resection(Whipple) 8 (30%)
Duration of Hospitalization (days) 7 (0-40)
STENT COMPLICATIONSMigrationTissue overgrowthImpaction 5 (19%2 (7%)1 (4%)

Value listed as number (%) or median (range)* Time after stent removal


Back to Program | 2009 Program and Abstracts | 2009 Posters

Society for Surgery of the Alimentary Tract
Facebook X LinkedIn YouTube Instagram
Contact
Location 500 Cummings Center
Suite 4400
Beverly, MA 01915, USA
Phone +1 978-927-8330
Fax +1 978-524-0498