Members Login Job Board
Join Today Renew Your Membership Make A Donation
2009 Program and Abstracts: The Stage of Recurrence Is a Major Arbiter of Ro Resectability and Outcome in Patients with Recurrent Rectal Cancer
Back to Program | 2009 Program and Abstracts Overview | 2009 Posters
The Stage of Recurrence Is a Major Arbiter of Ro Resectability and Outcome in Patients with Recurrent Rectal Cancer
Harold J. Wanebo*1, Giovanni Begossi2, James Belliveau3, Daniel Wrobleski3
1Surgical Oncology, Landmark Medical Center, Woonsocket, RI; 2Roswell Park, Buffalo, NY; 3Roger Williams Medical Center, Providence, RI

Purpose: Locally recurrent rectal cancer occurs in 10-30% of patients following primary resection and extra pelvic metastases occur in an additional 30-40%, some of which are resectable. The ability to achieve an RO resection of recurrence is governed by stage and biology of the disease which is the subject of this review. Method: Patients with recurrent rectal cancer (1990-2005) were staged as follows: TR local recurrence at primary site, TR1-invasion of mucosa, TR2-submucosal invasion into muscularis propria, TR3-full thickness penetration into peri-rectal tissue, TR4 (locally extensive) penetrates soft tissue or adjacent organ, TR5-invades bone, ligaments of pelvis. TanyNanyM1-distant mets, (visceral sites). All patients had been irradiated either prior to or after having recurrence (45-50Gy), usually with sensitizing chemotherapy. Patient Data: 156 patients were reviewed for recurrent recto-sigmoid cancer, 123 with rectal cancer and 32 with rectosigmoid cancer. All had adjuvant neoadjuvant chemo radiation or if not were give chemo radiation prior to salvage surgery. Patient treatment groups included palliative therapy in 58 pts: no surgery (chemo/radiation only 22 pts), palliative surgery-resection/bypass (13 pts)/ pelvic perfusion (23 pts) and resectional surgery with curative intent (98 pts). The latter included salvage by anterior resection/abdominal perineal resection +/- exenterations (34 pts) and abdominal sacral resection +/- exenterations in 58 pts. Distant disease was identified in 16 potentially resectable patients with liver (9), Lung (4) & Brain (3) metastases; all had resection with curative intent. Conclusions: Tumor stage directed RO resection of locally recurrent rectal cancer can achieve long term survival in approximately 30% of patients and mimics the well established resectional results of patients with liver metastases.

Primary Resection Rectal Cancer Stage of Recurrence REsection of Recurrence w/ curative intent Patients Survival Med mos 5yr KM
Local Excision (Rectal Cancer) Tr1-2 AR/APR 5 29 30%
Rectosigmoid Resect (Mid-distal Cancer) TR3 AR/APR Segmental 12 38 30%
Anterior Resection (Mid-low Rectum) TR4 TR5 APR ASR* 17 30 35 31 20% 35%
Abdominal perineal (Mid-low Rectum) TR5 ASR* 28 34 20%
Anterior resect/APR TanyNanyM1 (distant mets) Liver Lung Brain 9 4 316263532 38%



Palliative Group Stage 58 Pts Survival(median) 5yr KM
Post AR/APR No Surgery (chemo/radiation) TR5 22 12 mos 5%
Post AR/APR Exploration/Resection/Bypass TR5 13 11 mos 8%
Post AR/APR Pelvic Perfusion (pain/mass) TR5 23 8 mos 0%


Back to Program | 2009 Program and Abstracts | 2009 Posters

Society for Surgery of the Alimentary Tract
Facebook X LinkedIn YouTube Instagram
Contact
Location 500 Cummings Center
Suite 4400
Beverly, MA 01915, USA
Phone +1 978-927-8330
Fax +1 978-524-0498