Members Members Residents Job Board
Join Today Renew Your Membership Make A Donation
2009 Program and Abstracts: Laproscopic Surgery Decreases Anastomotic Leak Rate in Sigmoid Colectomy for Diverticulitis
Back to Program | 2009 Program and Abstracts Overview | 2009 Posters
Laproscopic Surgery Decreases Anastomotic Leak Rate in Sigmoid Colectomy for Diverticulitis
Liliana Bordeianou, Melissa Levack*, Patricia Sylla, David W. Rattner, David L. Berger
Surgery, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA

Introduction: Early studies comparing laparoscopic surgery for diverticulitis to open failed to show any advantages to the laparoscopic approach. The purpose of our study was to compare these approaches in a cohort of patients who underwent elective laparoscopic or open sigmoid colectomy by a group of surgeons who have performed ≥ 20 laparoscopic colonic resections prior to the study period.Methods: This was a retrospective review of 249 patients who underwent elective open (N=127) or laparoscopic (N=122) sigmoid colectomy with primary anastomosis for diverticulitis between July 2001 and February 2008. Our primary endpoint was the combined rates of free and contained anastomotic leaks (diffuse peritonitis or localized peri-anastomotic abscess) . We used intent to treat analysis to compare groups as far as other differences such as demographic factors, medical comorbidities, surgical indications and ultimate surgical outcomes(chi square, t-test). A logistic regression model was then fitted to determine predictors of anastomotic leaks while controlling for these differences.Results: Laparoscopic and open patients were similar in age ( p=0.56) , sex (p=0.62), history of diagnosed inatraabdominal abscess (9.8% vs 11.8%, p= 0.68) and history of IR drainage prior to surgery (4.1% vs 4.7%, p=0.81), but open patients had a higher comorbidity index (1.6 vs. 1.2, p= 0.035). Splenic flexure mobilization was much more frequently performed in the laparoscopic patients (82.8% vs. 26.7%, p<0.0001); however the length of colon resection (19.9 vs. 19.1 cm, p=0.231 ) was similar. Conversion was required in 22 laparoscopic patients (18%). The postoperative rates of wound infections, early small bowel obstructions, ileus, renal and cardiac compications were similar. However, laparoscopic patients had lower rates of anastomotic leaks (2.5% vs. 8.7%, p=0.036) . This finding held true on logistic regression analysis (OR 0.67, 95%CI 0.008-0.567, p= 0.01) even when controlling for age (p=0.9), Charlson Comorbidity Index (p=0.2), splenic flexure takedown (p=0.4), and length of resected bowel (p=0.9). Conclusion: Anastomotic leaks are less common following laparoscopic sigmoid resection than open sigmoid colectomy. Although splenic flexure mobilization was more commonly performed in laparoscopic patients, other factors seem to account for the observed differences.


Back to Program | 2009 Program and Abstracts | 2009 Posters


Society for Surgery of the Alimentary Tract

Facebook Twitter YouTube

Email SSAT Email SSAT
500 Cummings Center, Suite 4400, Beverly, MA 01915 500 Cummings Center
Suite 4400
Beverly, MA 01915
+1 978-927-8330 +1 978-927-8330
+1 978-524-0498 +1 978-524-0498
Links
About
Membership
Publications
Newsletters
Annual Meeting
Join SSAT
Job Board
Make a Pledge
Event Calendar
Awards