Members Members Residents Job Board
Join Today Renew Your Membership Make A Donation
2009 Program and Abstracts: Benefits of Laparoscopy: Does the Disease Condition That Indicated Colectomy Matter?
Back to Program | 2009 Program and Abstracts Overview | 2009 Posters
Benefits of Laparoscopy: Does the Disease Condition That Indicated Colectomy Matter?
Luiz F. Lobato*, Patricia Ferreira, Daniel P. Geisler, Pokala R. Kiran
Colorectal Surgery, Cleveland Clinic OH, Cleveland, OH

Purpose: The benefits of laparoscopic colectomy (LC) over open colectomy (OC) for a variety of conditions have been well characterized. Whether the relative benefits of the minimally invasive approach differ for different conditions has not been previously investigated. The aim of this study is to identify whether there are differences in benefits with LC for colon cancer (CC), Crohn’s Disease (CD) and diverticular disease (DD). Methods: Data of patients with DD, CC, and CD undergoing elective colectomy from 2000 and 2007 were identified from a prospectively maintained IRB database. Patients with CC, CD and DD were matched 1LAP:1OC for gender, BMI, surgical procedure, ASA class and date of surgery. TNM stage was also a match criterion for CC patients. Fisher’s exact, Chi squared and Wilcoxon rank-sum tests were used for analysis and interaction p value used to compare the relative benefit of LC over OC for the different diagnoses.Results: 289 LC patients were matched to 289 OC patients. Median age was 49(14-91) years in LC and 52(15-90) years in OC (p=0.35). All other matched variables were also similar in both groups. 34(13%) LC patients underwent conversion to OC. LC had significantly shorter length of stay (LOS) (3(1-70) vs. 6(1-37) days) (p<0.001) and lower estimated blood loss (EBL) (100(10-1750) vs. 200(10-1700) cc) (p<0.001) when compared with OC. Mean operative time was similar (LC: 153±78min vs. OC: 146±71min (p=0.54). For LC patients, the conversion rate was significantly lower for DD (1(2%) patients) when compared to CC (17(19%)) and CD (16(14%)) (Interaction p=0.008). Improvement in EBL with LC was least pronounced in CD and most pronounced in DD (Interaction p<0.001). The incidence of post operative complications was also reduced in LC patients, among those with DD (p=0.09). See table.Conclusion: LC results in reduced length of stay and estimated blood loss with similar complications rates when compared to OC. The benefits of LC are more pronounced in DD when compared with CD and CC.
LC vs. OC by diagnosis

Variable Colon Cancer N=186 Diverticular Disease N=112 Crohn’s Disease N=280
LC N=93 OC N=93 p LC N=56 OC N=56 p LC N=140 0C N=140 p
Age (years)† 64 (29-91) 69 (29-88) 0.11 53(32-84) 62(37-91) 0.003 38(14-78) 37(14-70) 0.26
Males* 51(55) 55(59) 0.55 35(62) 23(41) 0.024 65(49) 54(58) 0.19
LOS days† 3(1-51) 7(1-26) <0.001 3(1-9) 6(2-37) <0.001 3(1-70) 6(2-28) <0.001
EBL cc† 110(10-400) 200(10-800) <0.001 100(25-350) 350(50-1700) <0.001 125(10-1750) 150(10-1000) 0.034
Conversion* 17(19) xxx xxx 1(2) xxx xxx 13(13) xxx xxx
Intraop. Complication * 1(1) 2(2) 0.67 0(0) 2(4) 0.11 6(4.5) 3(3) 0.74
Postop Complication* 18(19) 20(10) 0.72 4(7) 15(27) 0.009 69(30) 44(33) 0.42
30 days mortality* 2(2) 1(1) 1 0 0 1 0 0 1

* Values Expressed in absolute numbers and percentages† Values expressed in medians and ranges


Back to Program | 2009 Program and Abstracts | 2009 Posters


Society for Surgery of the Alimentary Tract

Facebook Twitter YouTube

Email SSAT Email SSAT
500 Cummings Center, Suite 4400, Beverly, MA 01915 500 Cummings Center
Suite 4400
Beverly, MA 01915
+1 978-927-8330 +1 978-927-8330
+1 978-524-0498 +1 978-524-0498
Links
About
Membership
Publications
Newsletters
Annual Meeting
Join SSAT
Job Board
Make a Pledge
Event Calendar
Awards