Members Login Job Board
Join Today Renew Your Membership Make A Donation
2009 Program and Abstracts: Does Size Really Matter in the Resection of Primary Cystic Neoplasms of the Pancreas?
Back to Program | 2009 Program and Abstracts Overview | 2009 Posters
Does Size Really Matter in the Resection of Primary Cystic Neoplasms of the Pancreas?
Eugene P. Ceppa*, Sebastian G. De La Fuente, Srinevas K. Reddy, Sandra Stinnett, Bryan M. Clary, Douglas S. Tyler, Theodore N. Pappas, Rebekah White
Surgery, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC

Introduction: Proposed criteria for resection of pancreatic cystic lesions have included symptoms, size (>3 cm), and suspicious features by endoscopic ultrasound (EUS). The objective of this study was to evaluate risk factors for malignancy in a large series of patients undergoing resection of suspected pancreatic cystic neoplasms. Methods: Medical records of patients selected for resection of pancreatic cystic lesions at DUMC from 2000 to 2008 were reviewed. Lesions with solid components on cross-sectional imaging were excluded. Malignancy was defined as invasive or in situ carcinoma. Results: After review, 101 patients were confirmed to have undergone resection for suspected cystic neoplasms of the pancreas. Preop EUS was performed in 71 patients. Sixteen patients had malignant lesions (preop size 1.5-5.9 cm). There was no clear association between size and malignancy (Figure 1). Male gender, biliary ductal dilatation (BDD), pancreatic ductal dilatation (PDD), and suspicious cytology (but not age, symptoms, or size) were associated with increased risk of malignancy (Table 1). When factors available for all patients were incorporated into a multivariate model, only BDD and PDD were independent risk factors for malignancy. Only one patient with malignancy had neither BDD nor PDD but did have solid components by EUS. Conclusions: In patients selected for resection, size was not an independent risk factor for malignancy. While size might be appropriate for stratification of asymptomatic patients with simple cysts, size should not be used as a selection criterion for patients who have cysts with solid components or with associated BDD or PDD.
Table 1 - Malignancy Rate

Gender (Male) Yes (n=34) 26% No (n=67) 10% P value 0.04
Bile Duct Dilatation Yes (n=8) 62% No (n=93) 12% P value 0.002
Pancreatic Duct Dilatation Yes (n=28) 32% No (n=66) 8% P Value 0.004
Suspicious cytology Yes (n=11) 46% No (n=60) 8% P Value 0.014



Back to Program | 2009 Program and Abstracts | 2009 Posters

Society for Surgery of the Alimentary Tract
Facebook X LinkedIn YouTube Instagram
Contact
Location 500 Cummings Center
Suite 4400
Beverly, MA 01915, USA
Phone +1 978-927-8330
Fax +1 978-524-0498