Members Members Residents Job Board
Join Today Renew Your Membership Make A Donation
2008 Annual Meeting Abstracts

Back to 2008 Program and Abstracts


Perianal Fistula Occurring After Ileal Pouch for Non-Crohn’S Colitis: a Word of Caution
Isabella Mor*, Bo Shen, Susan Shedda, Margaret O'Malley, Jeffery Hammel, Feza H. Remzi
Colorectal Surgery A-30, Cleveland Clinic Foundation, Cleveland, OH

Introduction: A perianal fistula occurring after proctocolectomy and ileal pouch-anal anastomosis (IPAA) for ulcerative (UC) or indeterminate colitis (IC) may herald a change in diagnosis to Crohn’s disease (CD). However evidence for this association is limited. The aim of this study is to assess how often a perianal fistula following IPAA indicates the presence of CD.
Methods: Patients developing a perianal fistula after IPAA for UC or IC were identified from a prospective database and their medical record reviewed. Demographics, date of pouch surgery, colectomy histopathology, date of fistula diagnosis, clinical or pathological evidence of CD and follow-up were abstracted. Patients with anastomotic leak or fistula only to the abdominal wall or vagina were excluded.
Results: 105 patients were identified, 32 were female. 68 had an initial diagnosis of UC and 37 IC. Mean follow up was 118+/-70 months. 43 (41%) patients with perianal fistulas were subsequently diagnosed with CD. This diagnosis was based on complex perianal disease in 18 patients, characteristic inflammation of the pouch and/or anal canal in 16, small bowel disease in 4, additional fistulas in 2 and Prometheus testing in 2. 11/43 (25%) had histological evidence of CD in the pouch, perianal area or small bowel. The median age of these patients was 28 +/- 8 years compared with 34 +/- 12 in those without CD (p=0.007). Of those with an initial diagnosis of UC, 38% (26/68) were subsequently diagnosed with CD compared with 51% (19/37) who had an initial diagnosis of IC (p=0.2).Smoking was not a significant risk factor for change of diagnosis with 4/12 smokers (33%) diagnosed with CD compared with 8/12 (66%) who were not (p=0.51)Management of the fistula is presented in Table 1. Four patients with CD were treated with infliximab and 3 of these 4 were able to retain their pouches.
Conclusion: Perianal fistula complicating IPAA for UC or IC is associated with a change in diagnosis to CD, with all the therapeutic and prognostic implications inherent in such a change. This is especially so in younger patients and those without pouchitis. While medical management continues to improve, this complication results in a significant incidence of pouch loss.

Table 1: Management of fistula

Outcome CD (n=43) Non-CD (n=62) p value
Seton152 <0.001
Fistulotomy7 23 0.02
Flap repair or Pouch advancement1 9 0.04
Plug1 0 0.41
Diversion2 2 0.7
Abscess drainage alone 0 3 0.27
Pouch Excision 9 1 0.001


Back to 2008 Program and Abstracts


Society for Surgery of the Alimentary Tract

Facebook Twitter YouTube

Email SSAT Email SSAT
500 Cummings Center, Suite 4400, Beverly, MA 01915 500 Cummings Center
Suite 4400
Beverly, MA 01915
+1 978-927-8330 +1 978-927-8330
+1 978-524-0498 +1 978-524-0498
Links
About
Membership
Publications
Newsletters
Annual Meeting
Join SSAT
Job Board
Make a Pledge
Event Calendar
Awards