Members Login Job Board
Join Today Renew Your Membership Make A Donation
2007 Abstracts: Trends and Disparities in Regionalization of Pancreatic Resection
Back to 2007 Program and Abstracts
Trends and Disparities in Regionalization of Pancreatic Resection
Taylor S. Riall*1, Courtney M. Townsend1, Jean L. Freeman2, William H. Nealon1
1Surgery, University of Texas Medical Branch, Galveston, TX; 2Internal Medicine, University of Texas Medical Branch, Galveston, TX

Background: It has been demonstrated that centers performing high volumes of pancreatic resection have lower mortality rates and improved long-term outcomes. This has led the Leapfrog group (a consortium of employers with the goal of improving health care quality and safety) to initiate evidence-based hospital referral parameters for pancreatic resection, recommending that pancreatic resections be performed at hospitals doing more than ten pancreatic resections annually.
Objective: To evaluate the extent of regionalization of pancreatic resection and the factors predicting resection at a high-volume center (>10 cases/year) in the state of Texas.
Methods: Using the Texas Hospital Inpatient Discharge Public Use Data File we will evaluate trends in the percentage of patients undergoing pancreatic resection for all causes at high-volume centers (>10 cases/year) over the time period 1999-2004. Using univariate and multivariate models we will determine the factors that predict resection at high-volume centers.
Results: In the six year time period, 3,537 pancreatic resections were performed in the state of Texas. The unadjusted mortality was higher at low-volume centers (7.63%) when compared to high-volume centers (2.95%). The percentage of patients resected at high-volume centers increased from 57.5% in 1999 to 65.2% in 2004 (P=0.0014 for trend). This was the result of a decrease in resections performed at centers doing <5 resections/year (33.2% to 24.7%) and a concomitant increase in centers performing greater than 20 resections/year (37.5% to 44.3%). In a logistic regression analysis, the year of diagnosis was an independent predictor of resection at a high-volume center, with a 7% increase in likelihood per advancing year. Patients who were older, black, Hispanic, and had a higher mortality risk were less likely to be resected at high volume centers.
Conclusions: While regionalization of pancreatic resection at high-volume centers in the state of Texas has improved slightly over time, 35% of patients continue to undergo pancreatic resection at low-volume centers with 25% of these occurring at centers doing < 5/year. There are obvious demographic disparities in the regionalization of care but additional unmeasured barriers need to be identified.


Back to 2007 Program and Abstracts

Society for Surgery of the Alimentary Tract
Facebook X LinkedIn YouTube Instagram
Contact
Location 500 Cummings Center
Suite 4400
Beverly, MA 01915, USA
Phone +1 978-927-8330
Fax +1 978-524-0498