Members Members Residents Job Board
Join Today Renew Your Membership Make A Donation
2005 Abstract: Colonoscopic Perforations: A Retrospective Review
Back to 2005 Program
Colonoscopic Perforations: A Retrospective Review
Corey W. Iqbal, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN; Yun Shin Chun, Memorial Sloan Kettering, New York, NY; David Farley, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN

Background/Objective:
Colonic perforation is no longer a rare complication of colonoscopy. Our previous report identified forty-five such iatrogenic injuries from 1980-1994 (x=3,082 colonoscopies/yr). This current follow-up of the ensuing seven years examines changing trends of endoscopic usage in addition to management and prognosis of patients suffering colonoscopic perforations.

Design:
Retrospective analysis of 78,702 colonoscopies (1994-2000, x=11,243 colonoscopies/yr) allowed assessment of medical records in all patients treated at our institution for colonic perforation.

Results:
Sixty-six patients from our institution (perforation rate=0.084%) and six patients from outside institutions were treated for colonic perforation following colonoscopy (41 women, 31 men; ages=30-92, median=73). Sixty-two patients underwent laparotomy, while ten were managed non-operatively. All ten patients managed non-operatively were void of peritoneal irritation by physical exam; eight patients did well (median hospital stay=5.5 days, range=0-12), but one death (family declined operative intervention) and one pelvic abscess requiring percutaneous drainage were noted. Peritoneal irritation by physical exam was evident in fifty-seven of sixty-two patients undergoing laparotomy. Perforations occurred throughout the colon: right=22 (31%); transverse=5 (7%); left=44 (61%); and unknown=1 (1%). Thirty-eight patients (61%) underwent primary repair or resection with anastomosis. Fecal diversion was used in all patients with extensive peritoneal contamination (n=12) and twelve out of thirty patients with moderate contamination (40%). Peri-operative morbidity (39%) and mortality (8%) were significant. Factors predicting a poor outcome included delayed daignosis, extensive peritoneal contamination, and patients using anticoagulants (p<0.05).

Conclusions:
Compared to our prior study, the present review highlights a higher prevalence of injury based on more frequent usage of colonoscopy. Perforation rates remain around 0.1%. Expedient surgical intervention facilitates patient recovery.


Back to 2005 Program


Society for Surgery of the Alimentary Tract

Facebook Twitter YouTube

Email SSAT Email SSAT
500 Cummings Center, Suite 4400, Beverly, MA 01915 500 Cummings Center
Suite 4400
Beverly, MA 01915
+1 978-927-8330 +1 978-927-8330
+1 978-524-0498 +1 978-524-0498
Links
About
Membership
Publications
Newsletters
Annual Meeting
Join SSAT
Job Board
Make a Pledge
Event Calendar
Awards