Members Members Residents Job Board
Join Today Renew Your Membership Make A Donation
2005 Abstract: The Split-Stomach Fundoplication After Esophagogastrectomy
Back to 2005 Program
The Split-Stomach Fundoplication After Esophagogastrectomy
Vic Velanovich, Henry Ford Hospital, Detroit, MI

Background:
One of the most devastating complications after esophagogastrectomy is anastomotic leak. A variety of anastomotic modifications have been proposed to decrease the occurrence of this complication. In addition, patients with intrathoracic esophagogastrostomies have a high incidence of reflux-related symptoms, leading to significant quality of life issues. The split-stomach fundoplication was designed to address these needs.

Description of the Operation:
After completion of the esophagogastrectomy, the stapled cut end of the stomach is oversewn with interrupted silk suture. Using a linear stapler, the fundus of the stomach is divided in the long axis of the organ for approximately 5 cm to produce two "wings". A gastrotomy is made 2 cm caudad to the apex of this split, and a esophagogastrostomy performed with interrupted silk suture. The "wings" of the split stomach are brought around the anastomosis and sutured together to form a wrap. This wrap is secured to the esophagus superior to and to the stomach inferior to the anastomosis.

Methods:
All patients undergoing the split-stomach fundoplication were compared to all patients undergoing standard Ivor-Lewis, transabdominal, and transhiatal esophagogastrectomies. The incidence of in-hospital mortality, anastomotic leak, postoperative reflux-like symptoms, and postoperative stricture requiring endoscopic dilation were recorded. Statistical analysis was done using Fisher's exact test.

Results:
19 patients underwent the split-stomach fundoplication (WRAP group), compared to 53 patients undergoing standard resection (NO WRAP group). 84% of WRAP patients were male with an average age (+/- SD) of 65+/-9 yrs., compared to 77% of NO WRAP patients, average age 63+/-12 yrs. In-hospital mortality 5.2% in WRAP group vs. 7.5% in NO WRAP group (p=NS). Anastomotic leak: 0% in WRAP group vs. 17% in NO WRAP group (p=0.05). Reflux-like symptoms: 21% in WRAP group vs. 62% in NO WRAP group (p=0.002). Stricture occurrence: 47% in WRAP group vs. 28% in NO WRAP group (p=0.05).

Conclusions:
The addition of the split-stomach fundoplication to esophagogastrectomy does decrease the incidence of anastomotic leak and postoperative reflux-like symptoms. However, the price for this is a higher incidence of anastomotic strictures requiring dilation. As all of these strictures were successfully treated with endoscopic dilation, this appears to be a reasonable trade-off.


Back to 2005 Program


Society for Surgery of the Alimentary Tract

Facebook Twitter YouTube

Email SSAT Email SSAT
500 Cummings Center, Suite 4400, Beverly, MA 01915 500 Cummings Center
Suite 4400
Beverly, MA 01915
+1 978-927-8330 +1 978-927-8330
+1 978-524-0498 +1 978-524-0498
Links
About
Membership
Publications
Newsletters
Annual Meeting
Join SSAT
Job Board
Make a Pledge
Event Calendar
Awards