Members Members Residents Job Board
Join Today Renew Your Membership Make A Donation
2005 Abstracts: Current Management for Perforated Duodenal and Gastric Ulcer:Is H. Pylori Infection Really Relating To Perforation?
Back to 2005 Posters
Back to 2005 Program and Abstracts
Current Management for Perforated Duodenal and Gastric Ulcer:Is H. Pylori Infection Really Relating To Perforation?
Hiroo Naito, Deaprtment of Surgry, South Miyagi Medical Center, Miyagi, Japan, Japan; Tatsuya Ueno, Michinaga Takahashi, Department od Surgery, South Miyagi Medical Center, Miyagi, Japan, Japan; Hiroaki Kanno, Shinji Gotoh, Department of Surgery, South Miyagi Medical Center, Miyagi, Japan, Japan

Development of anti secretory agents with acid suppression has significantly reduced surgical patients with peptic ulcer. Recent researches have demonstrated that an eradication of HP diminishes ulcer recurrence. In contrast, the number of perforated peptic ulcer is not decreasing. However, clinical characteristics of perforated duodenal (PDU) and gastric (PGU) ulcer suffering from HP infection have not been well studied. Purpose: To clarify characteristics of PDU and PGU patients, and find clues of current management for perforating ulcer disease. Method: In the latest 2 years, records of PDU and PGU patients treated in our hospital were reviewed. Non-surgical, conservative therapy was adopted in the patients as follows, 1. Less than 65 years old, 2. Hospital arrival in less than 6hours after severe symptoms occurred, 3. Do not have serious general complications, 4. Accumulating small amount of ascites localized in the subphrenic cavity. Results: 23 (M; 18, F; 5) patients visited our emergency room. They consisted of 18 PDU (mean age 47) and 5 PGU (mean age 69). 14 cases (61%) did not have past history of peptic ulcer, and in 12 cases (52%), severe epigastralgia suddenly occurred without any symptoms relating peptic ulcer. Only 3 patients received medical treatment for peptic ulcer at the time of perforation. There was no case showing duodenal and pyloric stenosis. Rate of HP infection was 94% in PDU and 33% in PGU. Only 33% of PDU received operations, while 86% of PGU underwent surgical therapy according to our criteria. The operative procedures include omental plombage with drainage (6cases), drainage (3 cases), distal gastrectomy (1 case), and SPV with pyloroplasty. In only one case, conservative therapy was converted into surgical treatment to drain subphrenic abscess. Mean durations of nasogastric tube insertion, fasting period, and admission were 5.0 vs. 7.6 vs. 11.5, and 16.3 vs. 25.3 (conservative vs. surgical), respectively. Mortality rate was 4.3 % (1 patient), who died of septic shock just after arrived at our hospital. Conclusion: Half of the PGU and PDU patients did not have past history of peptic ulcer, and perforation suddenly occurred without any sign of peptic ulcer. Most cases of PGU need surgical treatment while PDU can be treated non-surgically. In PDU, as positive rate of HP infection is very high and no pyloric stenosis was observed, good long-term results can be expected by eradication of HP after curing perforating disease.



Back to 2005 Posters
Back to 2005 Program and Abstracts


Society for Surgery of the Alimentary Tract

Facebook Twitter YouTube

Email SSAT Email SSAT
500 Cummings Center, Suite 4400, Beverly, MA 01915 500 Cummings Center
Suite 4400
Beverly, MA 01915
+1 978-927-8330 +1 978-927-8330
+1 978-524-0498 +1 978-524-0498
Links
About
Membership
Publications
Newsletters
Annual Meeting
Join SSAT
Job Board
Make a Pledge
Event Calendar
Awards