Members Members Residents Job Board
Join Today Renew Your Membership Make A Donation
2005 Abstracts: Assessment of Diaphragmatic Stressors As Risk Factors for Failure of Laparoscopic Nissen Fundoplication and Postoperative Hiatal Hernia Formation
Back to 2005 Posters
Back to 2005 Program and Abstracts
Assessment of Diaphragmatic Stressors As Risk Factors for Failure of Laparoscopic Nissen Fundoplication and Postoperative Hiatal Hernia Formation
Atif Iqbal, Ganesh V. Kakarlapudi, Creighton University, Omaha, NE; Ziad T. Awad, University of Missouri, Columbia, MO; Gleb Haynatzki, Creighton University, Omaha, NE; Kiran Turaga, Resident, Creighton University, Omaha, NE; Mumnoon Haider, Research fellow, Creighton University, Omaha, NE; Sumeet K. Mittal, Creighton University, Omaha, NE; Charles J. Filipi, Professor of Surgery,, Omaha, NE

Background: An important limitation of antireflux surgery is a 5-10% failure rate. We investigated the correlation between various diaphragm stressors and failure of antireflux surgery.

Methods: Forty-one study cases who underwent a re-operative antireflux surgery from 1997 to 2001 and 50 control patients who had undergone a successful laparoscopic Nissen fundoplication during the same period without clinical or symptomatic evidence of failure were randomly selected for comparison. A retrospective analysis was conducted utilizing a standardized diaphragm stressor questionnaire, addressing the period between the primary and secondary operation. Stressors considered in the study included height, BMI, postoperative gagging, vomiting, weight lifting (>100 lbs), coughing, hiccoughing, motion sickness, retching, belching, anti-depressant use, smoking, preoperative grade of esophagitis, size of hiatal hernia, lower esophageal sphincter pressure, esophageal body pressures and preoperative response to proton pump inhibitors. Results: Of the potential stressors investigated, the following were significantly associated with surgical failure after adjusting for other variables through multivariate analysis: gagging (p=0.005), belching (p=0.02) and hernia size >3 cm (p=0.04) [Table 1]. Other potential risk factors show trends as obvious in Figure 2. Vomiting was significant (p=0.01) in the earlier models but lost significance when logistic regression was applied. Conclusion: Patients with postoperative gagging and an intra-operative hiatal hernia (>3 cm) have a poorer outcome whereas patients with postoperative belching have a better long-term outcome. Table 4: Logistic regression model.
Variable Odds ratio p-value
(95% CI)
Gagging/week 10.4 (2.0-54.0) 0.005*
Hernia size >3cm 3.17 (1.04-9.69) 0.04*
Belching/week 0.22 (0.06-0.82) 0.02*
Grade of Esophagitis (0-4) 0.93 (0.62-1.42) 0.76
Smoking Status (Smoker, ex-smoker, non-smoker) 0.58 (0.25-1.38) 0.22
Weight (kg) 1.02 (0.98-1.07) 0.33
* significant at alpha 0.05. Smoking assumed to have a dose response effect odds of smoker/ex-smoker=odds of ex-smoker/non smoker. Hence odds of smoker to non smoker=0.582=0.34. Figure 2:

All changes are non-significant but trends are obvious. Vertical lines display the 95% confidence interval for each group. Poor rPPI, Poor clinical response to PPI's. Good rPPI, Good clinical response to PPI's.


Back to 2005 Posters
Back to 2005 Program and Abstracts


Society for Surgery of the Alimentary Tract

Facebook Twitter YouTube

Email SSAT Email SSAT
500 Cummings Center, Suite 4400, Beverly, MA 01915 500 Cummings Center
Suite 4400
Beverly, MA 01915
+1 978-927-8330 +1 978-927-8330
+1 978-524-0498 +1 978-524-0498
Links
About
Membership
Publications
Newsletters
Annual Meeting
Join SSAT
Job Board
Make a Pledge
Event Calendar
Awards