# 2330 Selective Role of Vagal and Non-Vagal Innervation in Control of
Migrating Motor Complex (MMC) and Postprandial Motility.
Toshiyuki Tanaka, Luke H. Vanklompenberg, Michael G. Sarr,
Rochester, MN
Multivisceral upper gut transplantation is now reality, but motility in the
graft is poorly understood. AIM: To determine the role of vagal and
extravagal innervation in control (initiation, coordination, timing) of fasting
and fed motility.
HYPOTHESIS: Vagal and non-vagal extrinsic nerves are not necessary for
normal fasting or fed motor patterns.
METHODS: 3 dogs underwent a model of staged multivisceral upper gut
autotransplantation. All continuity (neural, lymphatic and all other connective
tissue) between the upper gut complex consisting of stomach, small
bowel, proximal colon, liver and pancreas was transected except for the
walls of celiac and superior mesenteric arteries and suprahepatic and
infrahepatic vena cava stripped of adventitia. Vagal nerves to stomach were
preserved (Stage 1) (confirmed by Hollander test). Esophagus and distal
colon were transected and reanastomosed. Gastroduodenal transection/
reanastomosis was also performed to disrupt neural continuity between
stomach and duodenum thus fully neurally isolating the stomach. Manometry
catheters were implanted in antrum and small bowel; dogs were
studied on =4 occasions during fasting and on 2 occasions each after small
(50 g) and large (200 g) liver meals before (Stage 1) and after transthoracic
abdominal vagotomy (Stage 2). Characteristics of the MMC and its postprandial
inhibition were determined. Data are mean±SEM.
RESULTS: A characteristic MMC persisted after both Stages 1 and 2. The
gastric MMC remained coordinated with duodenal MMC despite lack of
extrinsic or intrinsic neural continuity. No differences were noted in durations
(min) of the MMC (128±18 vs 137±7), the 4 phases of MMC (data not
shown) and postprandial inhibition after small meal (157±9 vs 164±19) or
large meal (312±32 vs 338±55) (p>0.05). Vagotomy, however, altered the
pattern of gastric contractions during phase III by changing number of
contractions (48±7 vs 17±2), duration between groupings of contractions
(1±0 vs 3±0 min), and motility index (12±0 vs 10±0)(p<0.05 each). SUMMARY:
A cyclic fasting motility and gastroduodenal coordination persisted
and was inhibited by feeding after staged extrinsic denervation of the upper
gut.
CONCLUSIONS: Neither non-vagal nor vagal innervation is needed to initiate
or coordinate fasting and fed motility, but vagal nerves modulate contractile
patterns during phase III. The denervation of multivisceral gut transplantation
does not disrupt normal GI motor patterns. (Support: NIH
DK39337)
|