# 2320 Abnormal Absorptive Function of the Small Bowel Following
Ischemia-Reperfusion Injury: Protection Afforded by Pyruvate.
Luca Cicalese, Melissa Brown, Pierpaolo Sileri, Sergio Morini,
Veronica Zuber, Jackie Blanchard, Cristiana Rastellini, Enrico
Benedetti, Chicago, IL
Background: Ischemia-reperfusion (I/R) of the small bowel has been shown
to result in tissue injury and chronic mucosal changes. The 3-carbon compound
pyruvate (PY), has been shown to prevent the mucosal damage observed
immediately after I/R as well as neutrophil infiltration and oxygen
free radical (OFR) production. Since information on the functional implications
of these changes are scant, this study aims to evaluate the effect of
I/R on mucosal function following I/R and the potentially protective effect
of PY.
Materials and methods: Male ACI rats of 200-250 grams were randomly
assigned to receive either a liquid diet containing 15mM/day pyruvate (N=4)
or isoenergetic amounts of polycose (placebo, N=7). After 7 days they underwent
three superior mesenteric artery (SMA) clampings for 45 minutes
each with a 6 day interval between clampings. A separate group received
the placebo (N=4) and underwent sham operations as surgical controls. Dxylose
absorption study was performed 24 hours after the last clamping in
all rats as well as in animals (n=6) receiving no treatment or surgery which
established normal values. A non parametric test (Mann-Whitney U) was
used to perform statistical analysis of the data using SPSS software.
Results: D-xylose absorption studies revealed that in the sham operated
rats absorption was not affected when compared to unoperated animals.
The absorption of D-xylose was significantly diminished in the placebo
group 24 hours after the last ischemic episode compared to the sham control
(serum p=0.01; urine p=0.017). PY treatment prevented post ischemic
absorption abnormalities maintaining values within the normal range (urinary
excretion expressed as mean %±SEM: PY 26±4 vs placebo 6.6±1.3;
p=0.01; serum concentration expressed as mean mg/dL±SEM: PY 31.2±6 vs
placebo 3.8±1.2; p=0.006).
Conclusion: The previously shown efficacy of PY to protect the small bowel
from I/R injury was confirmed in this study. Our data demonstrate that
intestinal I/R causes alteration of the absorptive function of the bowel. PY
treatment completely prevented such alterations maintaining D-xylose
absorption within normal limits.
|